When Australians talk about people seeking asylum, the discussion tends to be 'emotional and often not very thought through', but the Kaldor Centre Principles for Australian Refugee Policy challenge us to change that debate, said UNSW Chancellor David Gonski AC as he launched the evidence-based policy agenda on 13 June at Wotton + Kearney in Sydney.
Set out in a comprehensive paper as well as in a summary with Key Priorities, the Kaldor Centre Principles are grounded in evidence and informed by good practices, providing real-world examples of how a more humane, sustainable and manageable approach can benefit both refugees and the nation.
'The very least these principles will do is to start the debate,' said Gonski. 'And the very most it will do – which is just marvelous – will be to influence the policies, as people, I hope, take those principles and say, "Are we doing it within this principle or are we not?"
'I love the fact that, as I read through the principles, there are good arguments for each one. We are not only setting out for a debate, but we are setting out frankly the arguments for those principles,' Gonski said. 'So now if people don’t agree – and they are entitled to do that – they have to bring some science, some thinking, some intellect, to actually say this is wrong.'
First, comply with our international legal commitments and do not send people back to harm, giving each person seeking asylum a chance to fully present their claim.
Second, provide humane, fair reception conditions, rather than detaining people, particularly children. Australia arguably has the most restrictive detention policy in the world, and this, combined with offshore processing, costs billions of dollars that could be redirected towards more effective and humane alternatives.
Third, give people a fair hearing, in contrast to the current ‘fast-track’ procedure, which discriminates against certain refugees and lacks procedural safeguards. People should be provided with support to present their claims, decreasing the likelihood of appeals and increasing efficiency. A more transparent system would also promote greater public confidence in decision-making.
Fourth, keep families together and safeguard the best interests of children, including by appointing an independent guardian for unaccompanied children, and restoring family reunion rights for all refugees. Children should not be separated from their parents.
Fifth, create additional safe, lawful pathways to protection, which is in the interests both of government and refugees. Most people want to move safely and lawfully, and most governments want to know who has entered their territory and why.
Sixth, be a global and regional leader on protection, including by expanding our resettlement program and by actively promoting protection and solutions within the Asia-Pacific region and globally.
Seventh, invest in refugees for long-term success, by abolishing temporary protection, which hinders refugees’ ability to move forward in their lives, and by supporting refugees’ education and skills, enabling them to contribute to their own well-being and that of their families and community.
'Adopting the Kaldor Centre’s key priorities would be a significant step forward in showing that Australia really is a country where everyone gets a fair go,' says Professor McAdam.
Professor Guy S Goodwin-Gill, the Centre’s Deputy Director, said: 'Australia’s recent, politically polarising asylum policies have weakened social cohesion in our communities, decreased our credibility internationally, and demonstrated a head-in-the-sand failure to address the growing number of displaced people worldwide. Even worse, they have failed to provide humane, lasting solutions for people in desperate need of protection.
‘Good public policy must address real concerns in our community as well as real needs in our world; to achieve that in Australia’s refugee policy, we need to re-examine what works, what kind of society we are, and what we want to be. The Kaldor Centre’s Principles can help us to achieve just that.'