The Cambodia agreement

Save this webpage as PDF

 Download factsheet: Cambodia agreement 


This factsheet describes the agreement between Australia and Cambodia for the relocation of refugees from Nauru to Cambodia, outlines the agreement’s main features, answers some key questions about its application, describes progress on its implementation to date, and sets out some of the international reactions to its announcement. It supplements the general factsheet on refugee protection in Cambodia, and the in focus briefs on the implementation of the Cambodia agreement, and Cambodia’s treatment of Montagnard asylum seekers from Vietnam.  

The Cambodia agreement in brief

On 26 September 2014, Australia and Cambodia signed an agreement providing for the relocation of refugees from Nauru to Cambodia. The agreement is set out in two instruments: 

  • Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Kingdom of Cambodia and the Government of Australia relating to the Settlement of Refugees (MOU), and
  • Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding on Settlement of Refugees in Cambodia (Operational Guidelines).

The agreement was negotiated in secrecy without consultation with parliament or civil society in Australia or Cambodia, and its terms were not made public until after the signing. The agreement has received widespread criticism from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) as well as from politicians, lawyers, refugees, human rights advocates and members of the public in both countries (see below).

After being a refugee-producing country for so many years, it is commendable that Cambodia expressed a desire ‘to show the world it is ready to take… refugees in a humanitarian manner’ and contribute to finding durable solutions for some of the world’s refugees. However, by its nature and terms, the Cambodia agreement is unlikely to achieve this outcome. As stated by then UN High Commissioner for Refugees, António Guterres, the Cambodia agreement ‘is a worrying departure from international norms’. It constitutes an attempt by Australia to shift its responsibilities to refugees who sought protection in its territory onto one of the least developed countries in the region, which currently is not in a position to meet the needs of refugees – either those transferred by Australia or those who arrive by other means. As such, the agreement sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the integrity of the international system for sharing responsibility for refugees.

Other issues of significant concern with the agreement include that:

  • more than two years after its signing, many of its practical details remain unclear, including how much it will cost overall, how many refugees will be relocated and the conditions of their stay in Cambodia;
  • while the agreement purports to cover only those refugees who elected to be relocated on a voluntary basis, significant pressure has been, and may continue to be, placed on refugees on Nauru or in Australia to make them agree to relocation; 
  • many of the rights and services that the agreement claims to guarantee to refugees are unlikely to be made available to them in practice; 
  • it is unclear how the agreement will interact with existing Cambodian law where there is a conflict between the two, for example where the agreement guarantees certain rights to refugees which they do not currently enjoy by law (or in practice); and
  • as a result, the agreement carries a significant risk of violating Australia’s obligations under international refugee and human rights law.


Further information

For more information or queries about offshore processing and the relocation of refugees to Cambodia, please contact Madeline Gleeson, Director of the Regional Protection and Cooperation Project.

Madeline Gleeson
Director, Regional Protection and Cooperation Project
Andrew & Renata Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law at UNSW